Context:

Two second-round RBs from the 2025 draft, TreVeyon Henderson (Patriots) and Quinshon Judkins (Browns), are viewed as differing fantasy fits heading into sophomore seasons. Henderson carries the higher ceiling but faces an uncertain split with Rhamondre Stevenson and a potential committee approach under coach Josh McDaniels; Judkins is the workload-oriented option in Cleveland, benefiting from a true bellcow role but facing a regime change to Todd Monken. In PPR formats, Henderson is favored for his receiving involvement, while in Non-PPR formats, Judkins’ extensive rushing workload makes him appealing. The forward outlook hinges on backfield usage, coaching philosophy, and each player’s ability to translate rookie production into expanded roles. Momentum for both remains, but the decision narrows to ceiling versus safety depending on format and risk tolerance.

Dive Deeper:

• Henderson and Judkins both entered the NFL as the top rookie contributors for their new teams, with comparable rookie-year production and 12.1 fantasy points per game in PPR leagues.

• Henderson, listed as RB 22 with a 54 ADP in PPR leagues, logged 911 rushing yards, 221 receiving yards and 10 total touchdowns, finishing ahead of Stevenson in several games where the veteran was sidelined; this foreshadows a potentially larger role, though the Patriots’ history of RB committees clouds the share split.

• Judkins, ranked RB 23 with a 55 ADP in PPR leagues, emerged as Cleveland’s workhorse before an ankle injury and fractured fibula ended his season; he recorded 230 rushing carries, well ahead of the next Browns back, with limited involvement in the passing game (26 receptions for 171 yards).

• A coaching change in Cleveland to Todd Monken raises expectations for a run-focused attack, given Monken’s history of prioritizing rushing attempts, which could sustain Judkins’ high rushing volume even if snapshare shifts slightly.

• Henderson’s fantasy case rests on a higher ceiling driven by potential increased workload and big-play ability, but the Patriots’ prior McDaniels era — often a committee approach — injects uncertainty into his exact share and timing.

• Judkins offers a safer floor in non-PPR formats due to his workload and red-zone involvement, while Henderson’s value is more pronounced in PPR leagues thanks to receiving usage and playmaking upside.

• Overall guidance suggests drafting Henderson for higher upside in PPR leagues and Judkins for steadier production in non-PPR formats, with the ultimate choice balancing format, risk tolerance, and anticipated offensive philosophy.