WH says 'no dispute' deported suspected gang member had MS-13 tattoos despite photos to the contrary
President Donald Trump defended the deportation of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, an alleged MS-13 gang member, during a contentious interview with ABC News, citing photos allegedly showing gang-related tattoos. However, other photos did not appear to show these tattoos, leading to disputes over their authenticity. The White House maintains that multiple investigations confirm Abrego Garcia's gang affiliation, despite contrasting photographic evidence. Abrego Garcia's deportation has sparked legal battles, with courts ordering his return to the U.S., but the Trump administration argues that negotiations with El Salvador are complex. Abrego Garcia has a history of suspected criminal activities, including human trafficking and domestic abuse, which further complicates the situation and fuels political tensions between the U.S. and El Salvador.
President Donald Trump argued that Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a deported illegal immigrant, had MS-13 tattoos on his knuckles, supporting his administration's deportation decision despite contradictory evidence from other photos.
While Trump presented a photo showing 'MS-13' tattoos, Fox News Digital found other images where the tattoos were not visible, creating controversy over their authenticity.
The White House spokesman emphasized that various investigations, including those by ICE and El Salvador's government, confirmed Garcia's membership in the notorious MS-13 gang.
Legal proceedings have ensued, with U.S. courts mandating Garcia's return to the U.S., but the administration cites challenges in negotiating his release with El Salvador's government.
Garcia's criminal history includes allegations of human trafficking and domestic violence, complicating his deportation case and raising security concerns.
El Salvador President Nayib Bukele has cooperated with Trump's administration by accepting deported gang members, but Garcia's case has drawn political protests and international scrutiny.
The case highlights broader immigration policy debates and the complexities of international relations, as it involves sensitive negotiations and legal battles over deportation practices.