President Donald Trump has set a new precedent with his unprecedented use of executive orders during his first 100 days in office, surpassing Franklin D. Roosevelt's record. This surge in executive actions marks a significant shift in power from the legislative branch to the executive, allowing Trump to prioritize and implement his agenda swiftly. Experts suggest that this trend of using executive orders to bypass legislative processes may continue in future administrations. The Trump administration's actions, including agency restructuring and easing employee firing restrictions, have placed a burden on the judicial system, with numerous lawsuits challenging these orders. While this approach allows for rapid policy implementation, it also raises concerns about the sustainability and reversibility of these decisions under future presidents.

President Trump has exceeded the record for executive orders set by Franklin D. Roosevelt, signing over 135 orders in the first 100 days of his second term, compared to 99 by Roosevelt in the same period.

This extensive use of executive orders indicates a move away from legislative processes, with the executive branch assuming greater lawmaking authority, a trend likely to persist in future presidencies.

Experts note that Trump's administration had ample time during his years out of office to prepare and prioritize administrative goals, leading to a focused and aggressive use of executive orders to overcome past hurdles.

The administration's orders include significant agency changes, such as reducing staff at USAID and dismantling the Education Department, aiming to streamline government and fulfill campaign promises.

The judicial branch faces immense pressure from over 150 lawsuits challenging the legality and scope of Trump's executive orders, raising concerns about the courts' capacity to deliberate effectively under such strain.

Critics argue that while executive orders allow for rapid implementation of policies, they lack permanence and can be easily reversed by succeeding administrations, unless they cause lasting structural changes.

Analysts predict a slowdown in the pace of executive orders as initial pre-planned actions are exhausted, with future orders likely becoming reactive rather than proactive.