Trump Recasts Mission of Justice Dept.’s Civil Rights Office, Prompting ‘Exodus’
The Trump administration has significantly altered the mission of the Justice Department's civil rights division, leading to a mass exodus of lawyers and staff. The administration's focus has shifted from traditional civil rights enforcement to pursuing cases against educational institutions and liberal cities, as part of a broader agenda. More than 100 lawyers are anticipated to leave, accelerated by a 'deferred resignation program' that allows for continued pay post-resignation. Harmeet K. Dhillon, the new head of the division, has publicly emphasized the priority to enforce federal civil rights laws over what she terms 'woke ideology'. Critics, including former division leaders, express concern that these changes weaponize the division against the communities it was meant to protect, potentially allowing unchecked discrimination and constitutional violations to proliferate.
Under the Trump administration, the Justice Department's civil rights division has seen a fundamental shift in mission, moving away from traditional roles like monitoring police for civil rights violations, protecting voting rights, and fighting housing discrimination, to focusing on cases against educational institutions and liberal cities.
The recent exodus includes over 100 lawyers, prompted by a 'deferred resignation program' that enables employees to resign with continued pay temporarily, reflecting a significant depletion in the division's capacity.
Harmeet K. Dhillon, the new division head, has openly welcomed the turnover, emphasizing a departure from previous civil rights enforcement to prioritize cases that align with the administration's agenda, discouraging efforts perceived as pursuing 'woke ideology'.
There is a growing concern among current and former division lawyers that the changes represent more than a typical shift in priorities; they see it as a dismantling of the division's foundational purpose, with new mission statements that are unrecognizable compared to its historical role.
Political appointees have reassigned remaining career managers, creating instability and uncertainty among division staff, who now face challenges in maintaining oversight of existing consent decrees and enforcement actions.
The administration has also redirected civil rights lawyers to focus on investigations of antisemitism related to campus protests against Israel, with a strategic emphasis on leveraging federal grant money to influence university conduct.
Critics fear that the division's new direction will reverse advancements in modernizing law enforcement practices and leave many civil rights issues unaddressed, as the division's resources are redirected towards politically motivated cases.