Context:

In a dramatic Super Cup match, Tottenham, under new manager Thomas Frank, squandered a 2-0 lead against Paris St-Germain, ultimately losing in a penalty shootout. Despite the collapse, the performance showcased promising strategies, particularly in set-pieces, which Frank emphasized, drawing from his success at Brentford. The match also highlighted the need for further squad reinforcements, with Tottenham actively pursuing additional signings before the transfer window closes. The team's lapse in the final minutes raised concerns, but Frank's tactical approach showed potential for future success. The loss was a setback, but the match exhibited a foundation upon which Tottenham can build, aiming for a strong season ahead.

Dive Deeper:

• Thomas Frank's debut as Tottenham's manager started promisingly with a 2-0 lead against PSG, but a late collapse resulted in a penalty shootout loss, preventing them from winning the Super Cup.

• Frank's focus on set-pieces was evident, a tactic that served him well at Brentford, and both of Tottenham's goals came from dead-ball situations, indicating a strategic shift from previous management.

• Despite the defeat, there were positive signs in Tottenham's play, with an emphasis on pragmatism and efficiency, as they managed to keep PSG at bay for much of the match.

• The need for squad enhancements is clear, with Tottenham actively engaged in the transfer market to strengthen their attacking and defensive options before the window closes.

• The team's inability to maintain composure under pressure, especially in the final minutes, highlights areas for improvement, but the overall performance suggests a solid base for Frank to develop his tactical plans.

• Tottenham debutants Joao Palhinha and Mohamed Kudus displayed potential, with Kudus in particular causing difficulties for PSG's defense, hinting at promising roles in the team's future.

• Pundits noted the psychological impact of the loss on the players and emphasized the importance of reinforcing team morale and addressing tactical weaknesses to avoid similar outcomes in the future.