South Dakota students weigh protest against university honors for Noem
Dakota State University has become embroiled in free speech concerns as students and faculty plan to protest the awarding of an honorary doctorate to Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, who is slated to deliver the commencement speech. The university's decision has sparked criticism due to Noem's association with controversial federal immigration policies and her previous anti-LGBT actions. Many students, especially those from the internationally diverse student body, are hesitant to participate in the protest due to fears of visa repercussions and potential career setbacks. Despite the administration's emphasis on Noem's contributions to the university's cybersecurity program, the faculty and student senate largely opposed the honorary degree. The situation highlights broader tensions around free speech, with students and faculty expressing concerns about potential disruptions to the commencement ceremony and the overshadowing of graduates' achievements by political controversy.
Dakota State University plans to honor Kristi Noem, the Secretary of Homeland Security, with an honorary doctorate, prompting protests tied to her role in controversial immigration policies and anti-LGBT actions during her governorship.
Many students, particularly those in the cybersecurity program, fear the political implications of taking a public stance due to potential repercussions in their future careers, given the sensitive nature of their field.
The university's decision has been met with resistance, as the student senate and faculty largely voted against Noem's honorary degree, highlighting a rift between the administration's views and the broader campus community.
International students at DSU, who make up a significant portion of the student body, are particularly apprehensive about participating in the protests due to fears of jeopardizing their legal status and facing visa issues.
Faculty members report feeling discouraged from expressing their opinions publicly, with some citing the political climate and potential administrative repercussions as reasons for their silence.
There is a concern among faculty and students that Noem's presence at commencement might overshadow the graduates' achievements and lead to disruptions during the ceremony.
The expression of free speech at DSU is constrained by a state law prohibiting faculty unions, leading to a climate where both students and staff are wary of openly voicing dissenting opinions.