Shell pumped oil through Nigeria pipeline for years despite pollution evidence, documents show
Context:
Shell operated the Nembe Creek Trunk Line in Nigeria for years despite internal warnings and evident pollution, risking widespread environmental damage as illegal theft and infrastructure failures escalated. Internal documents show a 2008 warning from a technical VP about continuing to pump through the pipeline, and a 2012 red status flag that should have prompted shutdown or fast fixes, which were overruled. Communities in the Niger Delta seek about $1 billion in a UK case, attributing deteriorated livelihoods and health to Shell’s infrastructure and spills from 2011–2013, with the pipeline capable of handling up to 150,000 barrels per day. Despite cleanup efforts and a 2013- era audit/clean-up planning, the line resumed operations after temporary shutdowns, while locals press for accountability and environmental restoration. The case flags tensions between legal responsibility, security challenges, and the ethics of operating amid rampant theft and militancy, with a trial anticipated in 2025/next year.
Dive Deeper:
In October 2008, Markus Droll, then Shell's technical vice-president, warned that continuing to operate the Nembe Creek Trunk Line outside normal guidelines could force production closures if a major attack occurred, highlighting safeguards and potential poor condition elsewhere.
Ann Pickard, Shell's regional EVP at the time, criticized Droll for not marking the email as legally privileged, but argued that keeping operations on the line posed a lower risk to people and environment, implying future mitigation would be needed.
A 2012 internal form labeled sections as 'red' due to extensive illegal oil-theft connections, indicating immediate shutdown or corrective action was required, yet executives favored continuing pumping to avoid shifting theft elsewhere.
An internal 2013 chain shows executives considering an audit of oil theft and pipeline integrity; Vincent Holtam warned it could be unacceptable and expose Shell to government or community claims, leaving uncertain whether the audit occurred.
Project Madrid, a confidential 2013 initiative, assessed spill responses across about 100 illegal refineries and 9,000 hectares of water and land contamination, presenting options from temporary repairs to long-term production halts, though the final decision remains undisclosed.
The pipeline resumed operations after a series of repairs in 2013, with Shell arguing that actions addressed theft, refining, and militancy within Nigeria's security context, while locals in Bille say pollution has destroyed livelihoods and health, calling for remediation and accountability.