The proposed carbon capture pipeline by Summit Carbon Solutions, spanning 2,500 miles across several Midwestern states, is encountering significant political and legal challenges in Iowa and South Dakota. A group of Republican state senators in Iowa is pushing for a legislative vote on pipeline regulations, particularly concerning the use of eminent domain, by threatening to stall the state budget approval. South Dakota's recent ban on eminent domain for such projects has already forced adjustments in the pipeline's plans. Despite having secured agreements with over 1,300 landowners and permit approvals in some states, Summit faces court challenges and opposition from farmers concerned about safety and land rights. The Iowa Senate is under pressure to align with South Dakota's stance, as the Iowa House has passed several proposals addressing these issues, though the final outcome and gubernatorial approval remain uncertain.

Summit Carbon Solutions plans a 2,500-mile pipeline to transport carbon emissions from ethanol plants across five Midwestern states, aiming to enhance competitiveness in the renewable fuels market by lowering carbon intensity scores.

The pipeline project has secured permit approvals in Iowa, Minnesota, and North Dakota, though it faces rejection in South Dakota and various court challenges, complicating its progress.

South Dakota’s governor recently signed a law banning the use of eminent domain for carbon capture pipelines, prompting Iowa legislators to consider similar measures due to heightened concerns over land rights.

Twelve Republican Iowa senators have pressured their leadership to prioritize a pipeline bill addressing eminent domain, threatening to block the state budget until the issue is brought to a vote.

Summit Carbon Solutions has invested heavily in securing voluntary agreements with landowners but continues to face staunch opposition from farmers and legal actions over land acquisition practices.

The Iowa House has passed several proposals regarding eminent domain and pipeline regulations, with debate ongoing as to whether the Senate will adopt similar measures or if the governor will provide her approval.

Legislative and public opposition in both Iowa and South Dakota reflects broader concerns about property rights and safety, with state officials and stakeholders divided on the best path forward for the pipeline project.