Markwayne Mullin Makes Startling Pregnancy-Disease Comparison During Birth-Tourism Rant
Context:
A Homeland Security official linked to the Trump era suggested restricting pregnant women from entering the United States, likening them to contagious disease in a Fox News appearance amid discussions of birthright citizenship reforms. The comments followed a federal judge’s ruling that blocked Trump’s birthright citizenship order and subsequent White House talking points about birth tourism. The episode underscores a broader push among officials to reframe policy on travelers who give birth in the U.S., even as legal precedent and court challenges loom. The debate signals potential further policy tinkering, with immigration reform and birthright issues likely to remain contentious. Momentum remains uncertain as legal and political constraints shape what comes next.
Dive Deeper:
Mullin said he was working with Health and Human Services on a policy to restrict pregnant women from entering the U.S., comparing them to people with infectious diseases and suggesting late-stage travelers might be unsafe to travel.
He shared a personal anecdote about his grandson’s birth to bolster the justification, noting his granddaughter’s OBGYN’s advice against flying late in the third trimester.
The remarks came after U.S. District Judge Deborah Boardman blocked President Trump’s latest attempt to curb birthright citizenship, amid broader White House and Republican arguments about birth tourism.
White House aide Stephen Miller had previously described birth tourism as a policy issue requiring reform, arguing that citizenship via birth on U.S. soil creates long-term benefits for the child.
Fox News host Jesse Watters pressed Miller on whether foreign pregnant women might be temporarily barred from entering the U.S., echoing the administration’s concerns about birth tourism.
The Center for Immigration Studies estimated in 2020 that birth-tourism cases ranged from 20,000 to 26,000 per year, a fraction of total U.S. births, highlighting the discrepancy between political rhetoric and scale.