News Page

Main Content

Loss of FEMA program spells disaster for hundreds of communities and their projects

ABC News's profile
ABC News
3h ago

The elimination of the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC) program has left many communities, like Mount Pleasant in North Carolina, without crucial funding for disaster prevention projects. This decision by the Trump administration has revoked $3.6 billion in grants, severely impacting disaster-prone areas that relied on these funds to fortify their infrastructure against natural disasters. In states like Louisiana and Oklahoma, projects to enhance electrical systems and water supplies have been shelved, causing significant economic and safety concerns. The decision has sparked bipartisan criticism, with officials arguing that such preventive measures save substantial economic costs in the long term. Despite the backlash, FEMA maintains that the funds will be redirected to the federal Disaster Relief Fund and the U.S. Treasury, leaving many communities struggling to find alternative funding for essential infrastructure projects.

Loss of FEMA program spells disaster for hundreds of communities and their projects

Mount Pleasant, North Carolina, was poised to receive $4 million for essential stormwater and electrical system improvements, which were expected to boost the local economy by safeguarding new investments, but the elimination of FEMA's BRIC program has put these plans in jeopardy.

The BRIC program was intended to help communities proactively protect lives and infrastructure from natural disasters, a necessity given that 95% of Americans live in a county with a federally declared weather disaster since 2011.

The decision to end the BRIC program has been particularly devastating for areas like Louisiana, where over $20 million in grants were anticipated to replace vulnerable infrastructure, highlighting the program's importance in disaster-prone regions.

Both Democratic and some Republican leaders, such as Louisiana Senator Bill Cassidy, have called for the reinstatement of BRIC, emphasizing its role in saving lives and reducing economic losses, as supported by studies showing a $13 economic return for every dollar spent on disaster preparation.

The reallocation of BRIC funds to the federal Disaster Relief Fund and other government accounts has left communities like Stillwater, Oklahoma, having to consider raising local taxes or doubling water costs to fund critical infrastructure projects.

Legal actions are being pursued by 22 states and the District of Columbia against the federal government to release the obligated funding, with concerns that the loss of these funds could lead to devastating consequences for local economies and public safety.

Local officials, like those in Mount Pleasant, express frustration and concern over the disappearance of funding, which was seen as a non-political means to address urgent community needs, and fear further economic and infrastructural challenges without federal support.

Latest News

Around The Web