House Republicans block vote to probe Hegseth’s Signal use
House Republicans have blocked a Democratic-led effort to investigate Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's use of Signal for military communications, a move seen as protecting the Trump administration from potential embarrassment. By embedding a provision in a House rule, they prevented a vote on resolutions of inquiry, which are typically used by the minority party to initiate investigations. This action follows growing controversy over Hegseth's sharing of military plans on Signal, including with non-official parties. House Speaker Mike Johnson justified the decision as preventing political stunts, while some Republicans expressed concerns over transparency and the handling of the situation. The decision has sparked criticism and accusations of trying to cover up the issue, while calls for accountability and transparency remain strong among some lawmakers.
House Republicans have effectively blocked a vote that could have led to an investigation into Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's use of Signal for communicating military plans, avoiding potential embarrassment for the Trump administration.
By incorporating a provision into a House rule, GOP leaders have prevented Democrats from forcing a vote on resolutions of inquiry, which are tools often used by the minority party to launch investigations.
The controversy centers on Hegseth’s use of Signal to share detailed military plans, including with his wife, lawyer, and brother, raising concerns about security and transparency.
House Speaker Mike Johnson defended the move as a means to prevent political stunts, arguing that the Democrats' push was a waste of time, while some Republicans, like Rep. Don Bacon, criticized the lack of transparency.
Rep. Adam Smith, the top Democrat on the House Armed Services Committee, led the charge for a resolution of inquiry, which would have required Trump and Hegseth to disclose all communications about military operations against the Houthis.
Smith criticized the GOP's actions as a cover-up, expressing concern that without oversight, Hegseth's controversial actions would continue unchecked.
The decision has highlighted divisions within the Republican party, with some members like Bacon acknowledging the damage to credibility caused by Hegseth’s failure to take responsibility for his actions.