News Page

Main Content

A US judge partially blocked Trump's election integrity order from taking force. Is that legal?

Fox News's profile
Fox News
13h ago

A federal judge in Washington, D.C. has blocked parts of President Donald Trump's executive order on election integrity, highlighting the ongoing national debate over what constitutes election integrity. The Democratic National Party, leading a group of plaintiffs, argued that the order aimed to disenfranchise voters and overreach on electoral processes. Despite parts of the order being upheld, including restrictions on counting mail-in ballots after Election Day, other provisions requiring proof of citizenship for voter registration were blocked. The judge emphasized that the regulation of elections falls under the purview of Congress and state governments, not the executive branch. The Trump administration has yet to decide whether to appeal the ruling, with the White House maintaining its stance on the need for election integrity safeguards like citizenship verification.

A US judge partially blocked Trump's election integrity order from taking force. Is that legal?

A U.S. District Judge partially blocked President Trump's executive order on election integrity, focusing on provisions that could potentially disenfranchise voters, as argued by the Democratic National Party and other plaintiffs.

The blocked provisions included a proof-of-citizenship requirement for federal voter registration forms and the verification of citizenship status by election officials, while the rule against counting late mail-in ballots was upheld.

The ruling underscores the tension between the executive branch and the judiciary's role in checking presidential powers, particularly in using executive orders to make policy changes.

The judge highlighted that the authority to regulate elections is constitutionally entrusted to Congress and state governments, not the President, reinforcing the separation of powers in election-related laws.

The Trump administration's next steps remain uncertain as they contemplate whether to appeal the decision, with White House officials defending the executive order as a measure for ensuring election integrity.

The legal challenge reflects broader national divisions on election integrity and the appropriate balance of power among federal branches in electoral matters.

President Trump’s administration maintains its commitment to fighting for what it deems as necessary safeguards for election integrity, despite opposition from Democratic leaders who criticize these measures as unnecessary and discriminatory.

Latest News

Around The Web