News Page

Main Content

‘Musk’ Film Fires Back at Elon’s Shocking Legal Threats

The Daily Beast's profile
Original Story by The Daily Beast
September 10, 2026
‘Musk’ Film Fires Back at Elon’s Shocking Legal Threats

Context:

The Venice premiere of the four-hour documentary directed by Alex Gibney drew a five-minute standing ovation and sparked praise for its investigation into Elon Musk, while Musk denounced it as a boring hit piece and his legal team threatened action, alleging misrepresentation and excluding Musk’s side. Jigsaw Productions defended Gibney’s journalistic integrity and highlighted his international acclaim, including an Academy Award. The dispute centers on whether the film used Starlink to bolster Donald Trump in 2024, a claim Musk’s attorney calls false. The back-and-forth underscores broader tensions between open inquiry, free speech absolutism, and how powerful figures are portrayed. Momentum and dialogue remain unsettled as both sides prepare for further developments.

Dive Deeper:

  • The documentary premiered at the Venice Film Festival and received a five-minute standing ovation, signaling strong early reception of Gibney's investigative approach.

  • Elon Musk publicly labeled the film boring and a hit piece via a tirade on X, while his attorney, Alex Spiro, accused Gibney of misrepresenting facts and excluding Musk’s team from the production process.

  • Spiro’s letter, dated September 3, asserts the film insinuated Musk used Starlink to assist Donald Trump in the 2024 election and claims the project began with a conclusion rather than inquiry.

  • Spiro threatened formal legal action and reserved all rights, inviting the filmmakers to verify facts with Musk’s associates and noting the production allegedly refused to engage with them.

  • Jigsaw Productions responded by defending Gibney’s journalistic integrity, emphasizing his track record and international recognition, including an Academy Award and praise from The Times of London.

  • Gibney rebutted Musk’s critique by invoking the First Amendment and the defender’s role of open, fact-based examination of powerful public figures.

  • The exchange mirrors a broader clash between scrutiny of influential tech figures and the radicals of free speech, with Musk having anticipated a hostile reception years earlier in 2023.

Latest Entertainment

Related Stories